Industrial AI · Ireland · EMEA & Asia
For the people who run industrial plants, and for the companies selling technology into them.
Industrial AI data flow: process signals from the historian, operations records from shift logs and work orders, and engineering knowledge from P&IDs, procedures and incident reports all feed a layer of models, retrieval and rules, which produces an operating decision with its evidence attached.
Market access for companies with good technology and no local presence.
See commercialisationA recorded step test in. Tuning you can defend out — simulated before it reaches the controller.
Somebody at this plant has seen this fault before. The record of it exists. At four in the morning, nobody can find it.
The asset the question is about. Everything below attaches to this tag, not to a folder somebody has to find.
The knowledge is not missing. It is scattered across systems that were never built to talk to each other, and it thins out every time somebody experienced leaves.
The historian holds the trend. The CMMS holds what was replaced. The shift log holds what the operator actually saw, in their own words. The document system holds the P&ID. Four systems, one machine, no link between them. And nobody is going to migrate decades of records into a fifth system to fix that.
Keywords give you a list to read through under time pressure. What is actually needed is the thinking behind the last decision: what was tried, what was ruled out, and why the call went the way it did. That was never written down as a document. It sits implied across several.
Every process plant runs partly on people who know what a particular machine does when it misbehaves. When they retire or move on, that goes with them, unless it was captured against the equipment tag rather than in a conversation at handover.
And when an incident is reviewed months later, or an auditor asks why the plant did what it did, the answer has to be shown rather than remembered.
Plant Memory is in development. We are not putting a number on what it saves. When there is evidence for one, we will publish it.
One shift, recorded so the next one can use it.
Crew, state, open items.
In the operator’s words.
Tagged to the asset.
Raised once, visible after.
Owner and expectation.
Structured, not prose at 06:00.
Evidence that stands up.
The strip above is the process. This is what it leaves behind — searchable months later, tagged to the machine rather than to a shift. Illustrative · in development
For technology companies whose constraint is distribution, not engineering.
Company registered in Ireland; the work is delivered from here.
Select a region
It starts where the plant is run, and ends where somebody can show it worked.
Tell us the problem. We will say plainly whether SynapseAI is the right fit.
Three connected areas. It develops industrial software for process plants, starting with the SynapseAI PID Tuner. It provides independent consulting on automation, industrial AI, digitalisation and OT cybersecurity. And it helps industrial technology companies reach customers across EMEA and Asia through market entry, business development and direct sales.
Based in Ireland, working across Europe, the Middle East, Africa and Asia. Software is delivered anywhere; consulting and commercial work is delivered remotely and on site depending on the engagement.
Primarily the process industries — oil and gas, chemicals, petrochemical, cement, metals and mining, pulp and paper, power, water, pharmaceutical, food and beverage, and general manufacturing — plus data centres, renewables and utilities.
No. SynapseAI is vendor independent. Its software works alongside whichever DCS, PLC, SCADA or historian a site already runs, and its consulting is not tied to reselling any single vendor's hardware.